For men of science who want better chemistry.
You love the women in your life.
You want them to be happy.
so many
It can overwhelm.
Even if you
- troubleshoot complex problems professionally,
- studied systems thinking,
- and meditate regularly…
Any ‘right’ responses might
feel lost in the blur.
So you’re alone.
They can’t reach you
or ‘get’ what it’s like for you.
It’s extra disorienting
if you understand other stuff
better or faster than most people.
But it doesn’t mean there’s anything wrong with you.
If half (or more) of these apply,
You avoid
party banter.
You prefer to do
your own research.
You figure things out
on your own.
You think
about ethics.
You don't "wear rose-colored glasses."
Your interests aren't
at all mainstream.
i've got good news for you.
HI, I'M BREE.
I’m a tri-national, polymath autodidact with a Dutch degree in Applied Laboratory Science.
Once my thesis work was published in a peer-reviewed journal, I left the lab for a far more invigorating path to discovery: scientific inquiry into subjective experience.
As a rational, logical woman, I’m uniquely equipped to support fellow scientists who, like me,
- see skepticism as both a help and a hindrance,
- refuse to overridde or suspend critical thinking capacity,
- recognize scientific rigor as a desirable skill to leverage, not ignore.
I was relieved to discover that I need not trust in the benevolence of a facilitator in order to get the calming, emotion-neutralizing effects of directly documenting verifiable data about my human experience.
I was thrilled to verify that first-hand, scientific observation can invert self-loathing, self-sabotage, and self-isolation in wise, responsive, rational ways — without psychoanalysis, visualization, or ‘energy work.’
I specialize in this approach because so few other options appeal to scientists, and you deserve to thrive.
do smarts affect the art of connecting from the heart?
